October 12, 2007

Weekly Roundup

1. I previously blogged about 529 plans, here and here. One of the nation's leading experts on these plans is Susan Bart, which whom I used to work. Ms. Bart has details here about some changes to Illinois law in this area. Most interesting to me is the creditor protection afforded to 529 plans.

2. This article talks about a Will contest and settlement involving former Massachusetts state representative Thomas Cahir. The scenario was (in my opinion) one of the most common: sibling vs. sibling. (The other we see fairly often is surviving second or third spouse vs. children of a prior marriage.) This quote, from one of the attorneys involved, is pretty accurate: "On the eve of trial the family decided to make a settlement, as is frequently the case in will contests." That's unfortunate -- it would be better for all parties to reach a settlement way before the eve of trial, but that's not human nature.

3. Evidently Hillary Clinton has come out with a tax proposal that involves keeping the estate tax exemption at its 2009 level ($3.5 million per person, which is potentially $7 million for a married couple). Here are a few details. Once I finish the article I'm working on, I'd like to put together a comparison of how the various candidates would handle the estate tax.

March 20, 2006

Contesting a Will and Statutes of Limitations

Over the weekend I received an e-mail from a reader in Missouri, asking about time limitations and Will contests.  In Illinois, the rule is as follows:

Within 6 months after the admission to probate of a... will... any interested person may file a petition in the proceeding... to contest the validity of the will.

This rule is found in ยง8-1(a) of the Illinois Probate Act (755 ILCS 5/8-1).  Section 8-1(f) of the Illinois Probate Act applies the same rule to "[a]n action to set aside or contest the validity of a revocable inter vivos trust agreement or declaration of trust to which a legacy is provided by the settlor's will."  The practical upshot of these rules is fairly simple: if you don't file your Will or trust contest within the six-month period after the Will is admitted to probate, then your action is barred.

According to the reader (whose information I haven't verified), Missouri has the same six-month rule.

Basically, the reader wondered if the setting of a time limitation on a Will contest could "allow self interested parties... to cover up or not disclose something until after the deadline to contest has passed.  What protection is there in place should something substantial arise after the deadline has passed that [had it been known prior to the deadline] would have warranted filing a Will contest[?]"

Statutes of limitations are employed in probate because there's a public policy in favor of the speedy and orderly administration of estates.  Basically, the legislature has decided that we don't want a situation where the administration of a testate estate is completed (including the distribution of property to the Will's beneficiaries) and then, 2 -- or 5 or 10 -- years later, someone tries to undo that administration by filing a Will contest.  Not having a time limitation for Will contests could wreak havoc with our courts and with beneficiaries (who could potentially have to refund their inheritances). 

Of course, as the reader implies, having statutes of limitations for Will contests means that a person could be robbed of his or her inheritance if he or she doesn't file a Will contest within the six-month time period, and then discovers facts that suggest such a contest would have been successful.   Are there any ways of preventing this?  I can think of only one piece of advice:

BE VIGILANT

If you think someone is taking advantage of an elderly relative or friend, or think an elderly relative or friend can't make decisions for himself or herself anymore, do something about it. Besides producing good karma, spending time with an elderly relative or friend means that you should be able to tell if the person is incompetent or being unduly influenced, enabling you to get them help during their life.  If, after a person's death, you assert for the first time that the decedent wasn't able to make his or her own decisions or was being controlled by a third party, you will likely run into proof problems.  There's also a good chance that (fairly or unfairly) the attorney for the other side will attempt to portray you as greedy.

Bookmark: Bookmark Contesting%20a%20Will%20and%20Statutes%20of%20Limitations at Google.com Bookmark Contesting%20a%20Will%20and%20Statutes%20of%20Limitations at del.icio.us Digg Contesting%20a%20Will%20and%20Statutes%20of%20Limitations at Digg.com Bookmark Contesting%20a%20Will%20and%20Statutes%20of%20Limitations at Spurl.net Bookmark Contesting%20a%20Will%20and%20Statutes%20of%20Limitations at Simpy.com Bookmark Contesting%20a%20Will%20and%20Statutes%20of%20Limitations at NewsVine Blink this Contesting%20a%20Will%20and%20Statutes%20of%20Limitations at blinklist.com Bookmark Contesting%20a%20Will%20and%20Statutes%20of%20Limitations at Furl.net Bookmark Contesting%20a%20Will%20and%20Statutes%20of%20Limitations at reddit.com Fark Contesting%20a%20Will%20and%20Statutes%20of%20Limitations at Fark.com Bookmark Contesting%20a%20Will%20and%20Statutes%20of%20Limitations at Yahoo! MyWeb