November 29, 2007

Larry King and Life Insurance Settlements

Suspenders-loving serial groom Larry King was in the news recently, in a Wall Street Journal article on life insurance settlements. The article can be found here.

Note that the type of life insurance settlement mentioned in the article is not the same as a viatical settlement, which was a concept that became popular about a decade ago. Viatical settlements were used in cases of terminally ill individuals (such as individuals with AIDS), to free up money for treatment, etc.

By contrast, life insurance settlements are used by individuals who are not terminally ill, individuals who have existing policies on which they no longer want to pay the premiums.

By the way, The Smoking Gun has a copy of Mr. King's complaint here. Slate's Timothy Noah offers commentary in an article entitled "Larry King, Sucker." Can you guess Mr. Noah's position?

March 26, 2007

TrustManager

In my series on irrevocable life insurance trusts (ILITs), I spoke about the need to give beneficiaries notice every time a contribution is made. This is a bit of a hassle, especially if you have numerous beneficiaries. One option that just came to my attention is called TrustManager. According to Kevin J. O'Connor, who evidently works for the company that runs this site, TrustManager will automatically take care of sending out the necessary notices:

Once the program has been populated with all of the necessary information (it takes about 20 to 30 minutes) the system runs automatically. The only things necessary are that the trustee needs to go on line to acknowledge that the gift has been received and to pay the annual fee. Everything else is programed so that it all happens automatically and all of the records are kept for the duration of the trust.

Mr. O'Connor adds that the fee for the service is "$50 per year / per trust. That fee is
the same regardless of the number of beneficiaries or gifts."

| Share
March 23, 2007

Irrevocable Insurance Trusts -- YOU CAN'T AMEND THEM!

In Part 4 of my series on irrevocable insurance trusts (ILITs), I wrote that one of the biggest ILIT-related mistakes I see is "the failure of the grantor to understand that 'irrevocable' means 'can't amend or revoke.'" The Roth & Company tax updates blog mention this post here, stating that "[i]rrevocable means 'you can't revoke.' It's amazing how many people have trouble with that."

It's also important to remember that irrevocable means you can't amend. Every ILIT I've ever seen includes -- for good reason -- language saying that the trust can't be amended or revoked, and yet this appears to be confusing for clients AND practitioners. A couple of weeks ago I was reviewing a potential client's documents, and stumbled upon this document, drafted by a general practice attorney, which should strike fear into the heart of estate planners everywhere:

FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE [JOHN SMITH] IRREVOCABLE INSURANCE TRUST DATED DECEMBER 20, 1997

This same attorney had drafted the initial ILIT as well. Evidently she doesn't read or understand her own documents.

| Share
March 21, 2007

Introduction to Irrevocable Life Insurance Trusts (ILITs) - Part 4

Just a few quick follow-up notes on things I've already discussed in this series:

1. As I said in Part 1, the main reason people create ILITs is to pass more of their assets on to their beneficiaries free of estate tax. But that's not the only reason -- another reason is liquidity. Let's say that you die with a taxable estate and a family business that can't be liquidated easily to pay your estate tax bill. What to do? If you set up an ILIT correctly during your lifetime, the trustee of the ILIT can purchase assets from your estate or from the trustee of your living trust, and can pay cold, hard cash for these assets (which the ILIT trustee received when he or she collected the insurance proceeds on your life). Your executor or the trustee of your living trust can then use this cold, hard cash to pay your estate tax bill.

2. In Part 3, I talked about one of the "dangers" in transferring existing whole life policies to an ILIT. Another problem -- more of an inconvenience, really -- is that those policies have a value for gift tax purposes. You can find out this value by requesting a Form 712 from your insurance company. This value will need to be included on your gift tax return, and is equal to (wait for it) the policy's "interpolated terminal reserve value" plus any premiums you've paid for a time period after the date of the gift. Fun!

3. The biggest mistakes I see with ILITs are:

(a) the failure of the grantor to understand that he or she no longer owns or has any interest in the property;

(b) the failure of the grantor to understand that "irrevocable" means "can't amend or revoke"; and

(c) the failure of the trustee to continue to administer the trust correctly, by preparing income tax returns, by sending notice of each contribution to beneficiaries, and by keeping good, clear records of what has been done.

| Share
March 19, 2007

Introduction to Irrevocable Life Insurance Trusts (ILITs) - Part 3

The typical ILIT would be set up as follows:

-Grantor signs ILIT document, with grantor's spouse as trustee, and spouse and children as beneficiaries

-Grantor makes annual contributions to the ILIT, and trustee gives notice of contribution to beneficiaries

-Trustee purchases whole life insurance policy on grantor's life, and uses annual contributions to pay premiums

-When grantor dies, death benefit is paid to trust

Does an ILIT always have to work this way? Not really. Four variations on a theme:

1. Instead of setting up an ILIT, grantor gives money directly to his children, who collectively purchase a life insurance policy on the grantor's life. When grantor dies, the children split the death benefit. This variation isn't used very often, mostly (in my opinion) because it seems a little uncomfortable for all parties involved. But the big advantage: no need to have an attorney involved.

2. The trustee purchases a term life insurance policy instead of a whole life policy. The premiums will be lower, but the "danger" (is that the right word?) is that grantor may not die during the term of the policy, thereby making the value of the ILIT disappear.

3. The grantor transfers a current policy (or policies) to the ILIT instead of having the trustee purchase a new policy. This may be necessary if the grantor is now uninsurable, but the downside is what's known as the "three-year rule": if you transfer a whole life insurance policy to an ILIT and die within three years of the transfer, the insurance proceeds are included in your estate for estate tax purposes (as a gift made "in contemplation of death").

4. How about a 1/2 ILIT, 1/2 gift trust hybrid? By this I mean that (to take one possibility) one-half of grantor's contribution is used to purchase life insurance on the grantor's life, and the rest is invested by the trustee. Now you have the protection of the insurance if grantor dies in the near future, and the protection of appreciating investments if grantor doesn't.

| Share
March 12, 2007

Introduction to Irrevocable Life Insurance Trusts (ILITs) - Part 1

Over the next week or two, I'm going to be talking in some depth about irrevocable life insurance trusts (often referred to as ILITs by estate planners). Today I'd like to talk generally about these types of trusts.

There are many reasons to set up revocable trusts, such as living trusts: avoidance of probate, privacy, and controlling when your beneficiaries receive their inheritance are just three. By contrast, most people set up irrevocable trusts, such as ILITs, for only one reason: to pass property to beneficiaries at your death free of estate tax. This works because an irrevocable trust is, well, irrevocable. And that irrevocability goes not only to the trust document you sign, but to any property you contribute to the trust. You no longer own it, which means you can't get it back or control it in any way. This is why property held in a correctly-drafted irrevocable trust will not be subject to estate tax when you die -- because it's no longer your property.

How does a typical ILIT work? Here's an example:

1. Grantor (Mr. Grant), a 47-year-old, signs an ILIT with his sister (Ms. Trust) as trustee.

2. The trust provisions are for the benefit of Mr. Grant's three children, and are similar to the provisions in Mr. Grant's living trust.

3. Mr. Grant contributes $15,000 per year to the trust.

4. Ms. Trust uses the yearly contributions to buy a life insurance policy on Mr. Grant, with the trust as beneficiary. (I'll talk about types of life insurance at a later time, but let's assume $15,000 per year would be enough to pay the premiums on a $1 million whole life, or "permanent," policy.)

5. Mr. Grant dies, and the insurer pays $1 million to his beneficiary (the trust). Mr. Grant has passed $1 million to his three children free of estate tax and income tax.

There's obviously a leverage aspect at work here. If Mr. Grant dies in three years, he's paid $45,000 (in premiums) to "get" $1 million (to his kids as an inheritance). Of course, if Mr. Grant dies in 40 years, he's paid $600,000 to get $1 million -- not the best return.

Next time I'll talk about ILITs and gift tax.

| Share
April 13, 2006

Life Insurance Made Easy

Life insurance is one of those topics that is important to both financial planners and estate planners.  In my work, I ask about life insurance so that I can figure a rough value for the client's estate -- I may also need to help the client determine the appropriate beneficiaries of the policy.  However, because I'm not an expert on life insurance matters, I try to avoid the question of how to calculate whether you have enough life insurance in the first place.  I'm also wary of having an insurance broker answer this question because of the inherent conflict of interest.  ("How much insurance should you have?  How about $20 million!")  Are there other resources that can be of assistance in this calculation?  One resource that I would recommend is an article that appeared in Wednesday's Wall Street Journal.  The article is available online to Wall Street Journal  Online subscribers only, but it was adapted from Mr. Opdyke's just-released book entitled The Wall Street Journal Complete Personal Finance Guide Book.   

| Share